Co-op-a-palooza!

20161008_121252

This past Saturday, we dragged ourselves out of bed before the sun was up to head to Milwaukee for Co-op Fest! We had an amazing time, and were so impressed with  Riverwest and all the exciting things happening in this vibrant Milwaukee neighborhood.

Hosted by the Riverwest Cooperative Alliance, Co-op Fest is a one day conference that seeks to bring together co-op supporters from inside the Riverwest community and beyond. The theme for this year’s Co-op Fest, “Our. Cooperative. Communities.” and the website notes that this “reflects an emphasis towards our potential to reclaim our cooperative communities and sustain a responsible social legacy for future generations.”

The first Co-op Fest took place three years ago, and the event has grown larger every year. For this year’s Fest, they set up an outdoor tabling area, where participants are able to talk with Co-op representatives in between sessions. We loved learning about the New Barons’ Brewing Co-op, and are so excited for them to get up and running! (We also loved that they brought cookies baked with spent grains from their brews.)

While sadly we were only able to attend a few sessions, and had to leave before the event was over, we learned a lot and made some great connections. The sessions we participated in were engaging and lively, and session leaders were passionate and knowledgable. We were also happy to meet some other Chicagoans there, and see great potential for connection with other groups that share our interest in Co-ops.

Perhaps most importantly, events like this help to demonstrate how feasible Co-ops really are, and solidifies the idea that we are stronger together.

We are counting down the days until Co-op Fest 2017!

signature

Advertisements

Building Socialism: The Trouble With Digital Organizing in the Modern World

Recently, available technology options for organizers has been a topic on our DSA listserv. I was going to fire off a response, but it occurred to me that the topic deserved a longer, more thoughtful answer and that the blog was the right forum for this. I have worked as a non-profit information and database consultant for the last five years, and as I have become more experienced, I have also become more cautious about the adoption of new programs and systems.

Without question, social movements present their own challenges. We are oftentimes talking about people and groups with limited time/money/structure, but there is also pressure to be timely and agile in our communication and management of data. Security is a concern, as some people may not want their political or social views made public, and there is always the potential threat of the opposition using that information in a negative way. Another factor is the wide range of ability and resources that members present, so the question becomes how do you make changes that don’t exclude anyone while at the same time reaching new members and striving for increased efficacy?

I read a great article from Jen Schradie in the Berkeley Journal about this last year, and the author notes that “what was most striking in my fieldwork was how activists, whether Tea Party, union, or student leaders, never talked about how technology is a liberatory new way to organize, absent leadership or hierarchy. In fact, they often emphasized how it takes high levels of organization to bring people and keep people together. One activist talked about how they needed more organizational effort to ensure that working class people without Internet access can stay in the information loop. She had to put in more time and use a variety of communication channels to make sure that everyone can participate in the organization.” She also goes on to say that Internet activism can actually promote isolation if organizatonal roles are not transparent. This is all very important to consider as we strive build multi-generational, inclusive, highly effective movements.

Technology is changing at such a rapid pace, and we are presented with new apps, programs, and websites all the time. So what do to with all these possibilities? Should we just cast a wide net, try everything, and see what sticks?

Here are a few things I’ve found helpful:

  • The best course of action is to first examine the specific goals. Oftentimes, it’s tempting to look at what technology is available, and then imagine how you’ll use it. I find that this creates lots of false-starts, where a project will have lots of support at the start, but then it is either not fully implemented or no one uses it when it’s set up. If, on the other hand, you start with your goals and then work backwards, you are more likely to have the buy-in of the people who will be using the system and this is what creates truly robust data and communcation.
  • Recognize that no system will ever be perfect – you will inevitably be leaving someone out or have some amount of inconsistent data. That’s ok, the goal should just be to get it as good as possible.
  • Think about cultivation – in what ways are different members touched by your movement? What is the ideal level of involvement you’d like to see for your members? Try to see your own “blind spots” and fill those in – so, for example, what happens when someone first joins? Do they receive an email? an  invitation to like on facebook? At what point do you invite them to an event? Etc.
  • Consider different ways to be inclusive – for example, putting a buddy system in place for your group where you have volunteers who are tech-savvy and have access to technology who are willing to work one-on-one with those in your group who want more help.
  • Ask for feedback! Even a quick survey can be helpful. Do your members know where to get information? Are there things they wish they could do but aren’t currently able to? For example, in a recent meeting a member asked if they could watch archived webinars that they were not able to attend in real-time. I think that’s a great question, and something worth looking into.

It’s an exciting time to be an activist, and I’m so impressed with the varied and amazing talents that people willingly share in order to make the world a better place. We all have a spot at the table, so to speak, and it is going to take all of our efforts to move the needle even a bit.

signature

What’s the Deal with Education?

  With this political season in high gear, the candidates in the Republican and Democratic Parties are both making a big deal about education. Now, the cynics out there will say that they are pandering to the youth vote and to some degree that is correct. However all is not well on the higher education front. So the question at hand is what is the problem with higher education and what should be done?
  I believe the problem with higher education is money and access to college. Now, when I mention money, I am referring to the corrupting agent that turns an institution of higher learning’s focus away from the education   of its students towards profit. Money is what motivates public universities to continually build extra fieldhouses and administrative buildings that do not contribute to the students’ education. Money is what motivates for-profit universities or vocational school to skimp on the qualifications of their faculty and employ  very manipulative sales tactics to attract students. Throughout this entire process the students’ tuition increases to pay for all out this. Most student will take out student loans to pursue their degrees or vocations and those very loans which were exclusively in the domain of the government, to some degree has been privatized. 
  Now, I have always believed you do not always have to reinvent the wheel and solutions are a lot closer than you realize. The Obama Administration attempted to do something to curb the amount of students who drop out by making schools accountable for how many graduate a find employment. Schools who don’t live up to the standards in place, will be of risk of losing Title 4 funding. That means they lose ability to offer their student federal financial aid. It will suck immensely for an institution to lose that funding. I also believe it would also force schools to dedicate more of their revenue towards the students education. However this not strong enough. Here’s idea: The federal government should mandate that students have a yea or nay vote on items that are not directly affecting their education as far expenditures by the school goes. Students should be mailed a detail list of the school’s expenditures. That will also allow the students to be more involved with their education.
  Another idea would involve a concept the State of Georgia has in place for their students. Yes I did say the State of Georgia. If America is not ready for Universal Education up to the doctorate level because people don’t want to pay for it. How about we put in place a national lottery in which the funds will go towards paying college tuition? It sounds like a practical idea to me…